If I were to line up 50 women and ask them if they thought they had any imperfections on their face, I’d say 90-95% would probably say yes and then start rattling off a list as long as your arm. If I were to be lined up and asked this question, on my list would be the size of my pores on my nose and cheek area. I have very big and visible ( to me anyway) pores and always have and it used to cause me endless bother with spots and blackheads in my teens.
I am no longer a teen (boo!!!!) so I no longer have the issue with spots (yay!!!!). However, I still have large pores that are highlighted depending on how I apply my liquid foundation and most definitely when I use powder. I don’t like it as it makes my skin look dull in these areas and therefore, uneven skin tone.
As you can imagine I’m a sucker for any product that claims to reduce the sight of unsightly pores. Cue imagery of Vee at the till with her bank card wishing the product in her hands will make her look divine and banish the holes in her face. So readers, this was a reality last week with the new Maybelline Baby Skin Instant Pore Eraser. ‘Go on,’ I said… ‘They say it will work…”Maybelline wouldn’t lie to me would they?’ £7.99 later and I’m staring at the mint coloured tube on my desk. Yep. A sucker.
Maybelline’s Baby range so far is good, albeit only their Baby Lips is what I’m talking about but even so. Check out my post on this below. To me this price is reasonable. I’ve spent money on Benefit’s Porefessional primer at £24.50 and gave it away, Clinique’s pore refining solutions, god knows where that is, long gone, Neutrogena, Olay, Simple, I’ve had the lot. If they worked for me I wouldn’t be doing this post!
This morning I decided to apply my make up as normal to one side of my face and then on the other I used the Baby Skin. I did this for a proper comparison as sometimes you can use a product and it can almost have a placebo effect. I didn’t buy this product for it’s primer purposes so I’m not going to comment on it in this way.
The Baby Skin is like most primers, it has that gel-like formula that leaves your skin feeling silky and you only need a tiny bit for a good coverage of the pore ridden area. I then applied my liquid foundation (with my fingers) over the half with the Baby Skin, applied the rest of my make up and then took a step back to look fully into the mirror.
The pores are still visible to me. Quite a bit, but not as bad as the Baby Skin free side. Hummmm. I think I genuinely believed (don’t laugh) that if something is called an eraser, it will erase what it is meant to erase. I would however have to say it definitely did minimise, or blur the look of my pores. So not a total con right? It did reduce the look of pores, they didn’t fully vanish, maybe I’m asking too much. Or this product is designed with people in mind that don’t have large pores, only small ones that you can’t really see anyway.
Who knows! Maybe it just something I’ll have to accept and need to be smart and think cosmetics can’t solve everything. Would I recommend this product? Yes I think I would. It does make them appear less prominent, you would just have to bear in mind they might not disappear completely. An improvement nonetheless. This is definitely a dupe for the Porefessional and does the same thing, possibly even better, but for 1/3 of the cost. Maybe I’ll just have accept these pores. Maybe I’m just born with it….